![]()
Return
To Contents
CALCULUS 1 PROBLEMS &
SOLUTIONS
5.1
Optimization
Go To Problems & Solutions
![]()
Review
![]()
1. Optimization
A manufacturer may want to maximize profit. A distributor may wish to minimize
cost. Some quantities
are subject to be maximized, while others are subject to be minimized.
Maximization and minimization
are collectively referred to as optimization.
If a quantity can be maximized or minimized, then it can be changed, so it's a
(non-constant) function.
It depends on one or more variables. In this section we'll solve various
one-variable optimization
problems. Each such problem requires the finding of how to attain the maximum
or the minimum of a
function of one variable and/or the maximum or the minimum itself. If a
function depends on two or
more variables, constraint equations linking those variables will have to be
found and used to reduce
the number of variables to just one. If such equations cannot be found, a
several-variable method,
which is encountered in a more advanced calculus course, will have to be used.
Go To Problems & Solutions Return To Top Of
Page
2. Evaluation At Endpoints And Critical Points
Example 1
Find two non-negative numbers whose sum is 6 and whose product is a maximum.
Note
We see that 1 + 5 = 6, 3 + 3 = 6, 3.1 + 2.9 = 6, etc, and (1)(5) = 5, (3)(3) =
9, (3.1)(2.9) = 8.99. The
question asks among the pairs of non-negative numbers where each pair has a sum
of 6, which pair
yields the largest product.
Solution
Let x ³ 0
and y ³ 0 be
such that x + y = 6, and let P = xy. Then y = 6 – x, so that:
P(x) = P = x(6 – x)
=
6x – x2.
Since y ³ 0,
we have 6 – x ³ 0 or
x £ 6.
Thus, the domain of P(x) is [0, 6]. Since P(x) is continuous,
it attains a maximum and a minimum on [0, 6] (see Section
1.2.2 Theorem 1). We have:
P'(x) =
6 – 2x =
2(3 – x),
P'(x) =
0 at x =
3,
P'(x)
exists everywhere on [0, 6].
Consequently, the critical point of P(x) is x = 3. Now:
P(0) = 0,
P(6) = (6)(6)
– 62 =
0,
P(3) = (6)(3)
– 32 =
9.
Hence, P(x) attains its maximum of 9 at
x = 3 (see Section
3.2 Review Part 5). When x
=
3, we have
y = 6 – 3 =
3. It follows that the required numbers
are x =
3 and y =
3.
EOS
Remarks 1
i. The quantity to be
maximized is the product P
of two numbers.
ii. Initially, P is a function of two
variables. Then it's expressed as a function of one variable. This is
done
by using the constraint equation linking the two variables to eliminate one of
them.
iii. The domain of P is determined.
iv. All the critical points of P are determined.
v. P is evaluated at both endpoints and all critical
points. The largest value is the maximum.
vi. The question asks us to find
two numbers, not their product. So we determine both of them and
give them as the answer.
Go To Problems & Solutions Return To Top Of
Page
3. Using The First-Derivative Test
Example
2
A manufacturer of canned food packages the product in cylindrical tin cans. The
surface (side, top, and
bottom) area of each can is to be equal to a given value of A square units. Find the ratio
of the height
of the can to its radius to maximize its volume.
Note: Also see Problem & Solution 5.
Solution
Let r, h, and V be the radius, height, and volume of the can
respectively. See Fig. 1. So V
=
pr2h.
Also, A =
(area of side) + (areas of top and bottom) = (2pr)h
+ 2(pr2) = 2prh + 2pr2, thus h =
(A – 2pr2)/2pr. Consequently:

Thus, the ratio of the height h
of the can to its radius r
to maximize its volume is h/r = 2.
|
|
Fig. 1 |
EOS
Remarks 2
i. A figure is drawn.
ii. The quantity to be
maximized is the volume V
of the can.
iii. Initially,
V is a function of two
variables. Then it's expressed as a function of one variable. This is
done
by using the constraint equation linking the two variables to eliminate one of
them.
iv. The
domain of V is
specified.
v. All
the critical points of V
are determined.
vi. We use the first-derivative test to determine the absolute
maximum. See Section
3.3 Theorem 2.
vii. The question asks us
to find a ratio, not the maximum volume.
Note that the volume is maximized when the height is equal to the diameter.
Go To Problems & Solutions Return To Top Of
Page
4. Using The Second-Derivative Test
Example 3
A shoreline goes in the east-west direction. A tiny island lies north of a
point A on the
shoreline. A
lighthouse L is
located on the island and is 10 km from A.
A cable is to be laid from L
to a point B on
the shoreline east of A.
The cable will be laid thru the water in a straight line from L to a point C on
the shoreline between A
and B, and from
C to B along the shoreline. The part of the cable
lying in the
water costs $5,000/km and the part along the shoreline costs $3,000/km. What
must the distance AC
be so as to attain the least possible total cost of the cable and what's that
cost if B is:
a. 20 km from A?
b. 7 km only from A?
Solution
a. Let x be the distance AC. See Fig. 2. Clearly the total cost of the
cable is a function of x.
Let's
denote
it by t(x). We have:
|
|
Fig. 2
|

EOS
Remarks 3
i. A
figure is drawn.
ii. The
quantity to be minimized is the total cost t
of the cable.
iii. t is a function of one
variable.
iv. The domain of t is specified.
v. All the critical points of
t are determined.
vi. We use the second-derivative test to find the absolute minimum.
See Section
3.5 Theorem 1.
vii. The question asks
us to find and we do both how to attain the minimum total cost and that cost
itself.
viii. In part a, the
minimum occurs at a critical point, while in part b, it occurs at an
endpoint.
Go To Problems & Solutions Return To Top Of
Page
5. Solving An Optimization Problem
The above examples suggest the following steps of the procedure we'll take when
solving a
one-variable optimization problem.
i. Draw a figure if
appropriate.
ii. Decide what quantity is to be
maximized or minimized. Here let's call it Q.
iii. Define
and assign letters or symbols if they're not already specified in the statement
of the
problem.
iv. Express Q as a function of only one
variable. If Q initially
depends on two or more variables, find
and use constraint equations
linking those variables to reduce their number to one.
v. Determine
the domain of Q
(interval or set of intervals on which the problem makes sense).
vi. Find all critical points
of Q. Candidate
points where Q may
attain an absolute maximum or
minimum
are the endpoints and the critical points if any.
vii. Among the candidate
points, determine which one yields the absolute maximum or minimum of
Q. One of three methods can be
used for this purpose: evaluation of the values or limits of Q at
the
candidate points, the first-derivative test, and the second-derivative test.
viii. Calculate the absolute
maximum or minimum if asked for.
ix. Conclude with a statement answering
the question asked. The question may ask for how to attain
the
maximum or the minimum value, or for the maximum or the minimum value itself,
or for both
how to attain it and its value.
Return To Top Of Page
![]()
Problems & Solutions
![]()
1. Find two non-negative numbers
such that their sum is 9 and their product is a maximum.
Solution
Let x and y be
non-negative numbers and P their product. We have x
+ y = 9. So y =
9 – x. Thus,
P(x)
=
P
=
xy = x(9 – x)
=
9x
– x2, 0 £ x
£
9. We have P'(x)
=
9 – 2x = 0 at x =
9/2, and P'(x)
exists for all x in [0, 9]. So the critical point of
P(x)
is x
=
9/2. Clearly:
P(0)
=
0,
P(9)
=
0,
P(9/2)
=
81/4.
Thus, P(x) attains its absolute
maximum at x = 9/2. When x
=
9/2, we get y = 9 – 9/2 =
9/2.
Consequently, the two non-negative numbers such that their sum is 9 and their
product is a maximum
are 9/2 and 9/2.
Return To Top Of Page
![]()
2. Find two positive numbers such
that their product is 25 and their sum is a minimum. What is the
minimum sum?
Solution
Let x and y be two
positive numbers and S their sum. We have xy
=
25; so y = 25/x.
So S(x)
=
S
=
x
+ 25/x, 0 < x < ¥. We have dS/dx
=
1 – 25/x2 = (x2 – 25)/x2 =
0 at x = 5. Now, 0 < x
< 5 Þ x2 <
25 Þ dS/dx
< 0, and x > 5 Þ
dS/dx
> 0. Thus, by the first-derivative test, S(5) is a
minimum over
(0, ¥); hence it's also the
absolute minimum. When x = 5, we get y
=
25/5 =
5. Thus, S = 5 + 5 = 10.
Consequently, the two positive numbers such that their product is 25 and their
sum is a minimum are 5
and 5, and the minimum sum is 10.
Return To Top Of Page
![]()
3. A rectangular enclosure is to
be constructed so that it'll have one side along an existing wall and the
other three sides fenced. There are
1,000 m of fence available. What's the largest possible area for
the enclosure?
Solution

Let x, y, and A be the length, width, and area of the enclosure
respectively. See the above figure.
Then x + 2y = 1,000, so
that y =
(1,000 – x)/2. Thus:
A(x) = A = xy = x(1,000 – x)/2
=
500x – x2/2, 0 £ x
£
1,000.
We have A'(x)
=
500 – x.
Consequently, A'(x)
=
0 at x =
500. And A'(x)
exists everywhere on [0,
1,000]. Hence, the critical point for A(x) is x = 500. Now, A''(x) = –1
< 0 for all x in
[0, 1,000]. It
follows that A(x) attains a local maximum at x = 500 by the
second-derivative test, and the graph of
A(x) is concave down on [0, 1,000]. Therefore, A(x) also attains the absolute maximum at x = 500.
So the largest possible area for the enclosure is:
A(500) =
500(500) – 5002/2
=
125,000 m2.
Return To Top Of Page
![]()
4. A piece of wire of length 10
m is cut into two pieces x
m and (10 – x) m long
respectively. The
piece of length x m is bent to form a square,
while the piece of length (10 – x)
m is bent to form a
circle.
Find the value of x
such that the sum of the areas of the square and of the circle is a
maximum.
Solution
Let A(x) be the sum of the areas of
the square and circle. Each side of the square is x/4. The radius of
the circle is (circumference)/(2p) =
(100 – x)/(2p). So:
Since 25/p >
25/4, the absolute maximum of A(x) occurs at x = 0. It follows
that the value of x
such
that the sum of the areas of the square and of the circle is a maximum is x = 0 m. The
maximum area
is attained when the wire isn't cut at all and the entire wire is bent to form
the circle.
Return To Top Of Page
![]()
5.
A manufacturer of canned food packages the product in cylindrical tin
cans. The volume of each can
is to be equal to a given value of V cubic units. Find the ratio
of the height of the can to its radius to
minimize its surface (side, top,
and bottom) area.
Note: Also see Example
2.
Solution

Let r, h, and A be the radius, height, and surface area of the
can respectively. So A
=
(area of side) +
(areas of top and bottom) = (2pr)h + 2(pr2) = 2prh + 2pr2, and V = pr2h, thus h
=
V/pr2.
Consequently:

Therefore, the ratio of the height h
of the can to its radius r
to minimize its surface area is h/r = 2. To
attain the minimum surface area, the height must be equal to the diameter.
Return To Top Of Page Return
To Contents